Size Comparison: Sony FE 16-35 f/2.8 GM & FE 12-24 f/4 G Lenses with Other Similar Lenses

EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III Vs. FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM Vs. AF-S NIKKOR 14-24mm f/2.8
EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III Vs. FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM Vs. AF-S NIKKOR 14-24mm f/2.8

The new announced Sony FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM Lens (Amazon/B&H Photo Video/Adorama) and Sony FE 12-24mm f/4 G Lens (B&H Photo Video/Adorama/Amazon) are both great FE lenses from Sony. The size and weight of these two lenses are smaller and lighter than other similar Canon, Nikon, Sigma lenses. Let’s take a look below:

FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM lens compared to other related lenses:

As you see the image above, the FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM lens (680g) is the lightest and smallest lens compared to EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM lens (790g) and AF-S NIKKOR 14-24mm f/2.8 G ED lens (969g).

FE 12-24mm f/4 G lens compared to other related lenses:

EF 11-24mm f/4L Vs. FE 12-24mm f/4 G Vs. AF-S 16-35mm f/4 G
EF 11-24mm f/4L Vs. FE 12-24mm f/4 G Vs. AF-S 16-35mm f/4 G

The FE 12-24mm f/4 G Lens is much smaller and lighter than other related lenses. If compared to new announced Sigma 12-24mm f/4 DG HSM Art lens, FE 12-24mm f/4 G lens (565g) is only half weight than Sigma 12-24mm f/4 DG HSM Art lens (1,150g).

fe-12-24-f4-vs-sigma-12-24-f4-art

via: Camerasize

  • Nice!

  • Azmodan

    The lens hood on the Sony 12-24 looks ridiculously undersized for such an UWA lens. While weight is good, let’s wait and see how IQ stacks up against Sigma 12-24.